Tuesday, 2 March 2010

Response to Mateusz's Blog

My response to: http://mkocotblog.blogspot.com/2010/03/reply-to-blog-2.html

Dietary requirements in later family life, contraction of infectious disease? You're missing the point I have made my friend.


I did not state that Government should rule each individuals family life on their dietary requirements, I stated that when the precious moments of knowing that the individual is carrying a life, shouldn't more be done by the Government in order to prevent the hazardous potential dangers to the unborn?


The Government should take action underlining the point of NOT taking over their lives, BUT make individuals aware of the importance of gestation and to become a parent this should be made vital priority. That's my argument.

However, the point you made is adequate and everyone is entitled to their opinion.

In response to your comment, if the decision of smoking whilst pregnant is left down to people, this just shows that the individuals' are not setting a good example even before they reach parenthood. The wishes of smoking during pregnancy results in the baby's suffering.

"When you smoke, over 4,000 chemicals enter your body. One of those chemicals is carbon monoxide, which gets into your bloodstream, and stops your baby from getting as much oxygen."

http://www.nhs.uk/chq/Pages/2023.aspx?CategoryID=53&SubCategoryID=532

No comments:

Post a Comment